3 ms·
Is it right to recognize ChatGPT as a scholar? Shouldn't we just treat it like any other software tool?
by cod3rboy 3y ago
Is it right to recognize ChatGPT as a scholar? Shouldn't we just treat it like any other software tool?
- liliumregale 3y agoWe absolutely should treat it just like any other software tool.
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- contrarian1234 3y ago- software tools are cited (you often will site a paper describing the tool). If a tool generates a value and then later a bug is discovered, it's important that the tool was cited. - one purpose of a citation is to make a clear distinction which work/words are your own and which are not. Are you making a statement because it's based on past work, your own inference, or the hallucination of a LLM? With ChatGPT it's easy to get confused - there is also the more general issue of academic integrity. You shouldn't submit other people's/machine's words as your own Maybe more correctly ChatGPT should be on the authors' list ;)