Algorithms are NOT good at detecting AI, and every attempt so far has been laughably terrible. For example the internet is already filling up with students comp

Algorithms are NOT good at detecting AI, and every attempt so far has been laughably terrible. For example the internet is already filling up with students complaining about teachers failing their school work for false positives on AI text generation. And there's the reality of the Survivorship Bias when it comes to examples: the only times you see AI art are the times it didn't fool you, not the full set of all AI images you saw. Similarly, if the algorithm can find the easy ones but miss the same better ones, is it really that useful? Or is it just training more realistic AI to evade both you and the algorithms detection? The idea that people will fundamentally be able to differentiate AI and human works is nonsensical from a future perspective and is an aberration of AI quality for the next few years at most. If you're not preparing for fully indistinguishable AI text/image/video/audio, then you're not preparing for the future.