> you said you were sceptical of their trustworthiness because they hadn't open-sourced the server-side components I never said that. I said that: - Their mar

> you said you were sceptical of their trustworthiness because they hadn't open-sourced the server-side components I never said that. I said that: - Their marketing is disingenuous because they call themselves "open source",[1] when their server side component is in fact not open source. - I was "skeptical" regarding one very specific thing: > if their clients are indeed open source (...), and all encryption happens client-side before being sent to the server (...), how would it even be possible for this [tutanota being compromised] to be true? [1]: You can confirm this by searching for `site:https://mastodon.social/@Tutanota https://mastodon.social/@Tutanota open source`