That's the question I was asking myself too when I read quotes such as: > Frank Scheiner complained to the mailing list, saying that he and others had been wor

That's the question I was asking myself too when I read quotes such as: > Frank Scheiner complained to the mailing list, saying that he and others had been working to resolve the problems with this architecture and had been rewarded by seeing it removed anyway That sounds a lot like "sunk costs fallacy" - "we invested a lot of work into this, so we want to go on with it". But it doesn't answer if there are enough actual users left to justify this work?