3 ms·

The author doesn't appear to even consider any kind of obligation to their users.

• mazzystar 3y ago
  I'm sorry you feel that way. The primary intention of writing this article was to discuss it from the perspective of a 'failed product,' so I didn't mention my personal feelings. I am also aware of the potential harm it could cause to users, which is why I don't resent OpenAI's review process. I hope that during the period without review, it didn't cause any psychological harm to users.
  • stevage 3y ago
    >so I didn't mention my personal feelings That's a strange comment. The article is full of your personal feelings. > But this paper gave me a different feeling, > And I personally prefer subscription > I don’t dislike this, as it aligns with human nature. > However, I started to feel a sense of loss...what real significance did it hold for me? > This further disheartened me, > Reluctantly, I had to abandon the idea.
  • Planktonne 3y ago
    This is a 'failed product' with a massive ethical dimension; not considering that, or relying only on hope, is negligent.