4 ms·
This article is such a stark contrast from the GraphCast AI weather model they released [1]. The latter focused so much on the tech and what it does do, whereas
by kevmo314 3y ago
This article is such a stark contrast from the GraphCast AI weather model they released [1]. The latter focused so much on the tech and what it does do, whereas this article buries the tech in a bunch of fluff about what it could do.
Can you imagine if the GraphCast article were like that? "Revolutionizing the future of weather".
I'm sure this music thing is cool but I have no idea what was built.
[1]: https://deepmind.google/discover/blog/graphcast-ai-model-for-faster-and-more-accurate-global-weather-forecasting/ https://deepmind.google/discover/blog/graphcast-ai-model-for...
- Dalewyn 3y agoIt's because the audiences are different. Lyria is for operators, Graphcast is for engineers. The former care about what something does, the latter care about how something does.
- armcat 3y agoIt's definitely a stark contrast, but it's also two vastly different domains. One is traditionally the domain of deep science and simulations, and the other is the domain of artists and creatives. Their announcement is also pretty clear - it's a new generative model (Lyria), which seems to do some impressive vocals generation (at least in the sampled videos); combined with a creators' platform/toolbox.
- jacquesm 3y agoFor now weather models are - fortunately - not generative.