If most WMs are slower out of the box then Wayland is de-facto slower. "But actually, Wayland is a protocol, and you can use this specialized WM optimized for s

If most WMs are slower out of the box then Wayland is de-facto slower. "But actually, Wayland is a protocol, and you can use this specialized WM optimized for speed" doesn't change much about that. I don't use a compositing WM. I would have to check how the performance compares to a compositing WM. It's just one more thing that's worse-out-of-the-box with Wayland that I need to find a solution for, while at the same time solving exactly zero issues for me.