3 ms·
A common counterargument is that organisms already have information stored in their DNA, which in turn has a noticeable impact on their behaviour. Plus the fact
by intelkishan 3y ago
A common counterargument is that organisms already have information stored in their DNA, which in turn has a noticeable impact on their behaviour. Plus the fact that they receive a large amount of sensory data which is often discounted in such debates.
- cozzyd 3y agoGreat, instead of using a corpus, just use videos from toddlers walking around with a go pro as training data for your AI model and see how far that gets you.
- calf 3y agoWell I think toddlers get both offline training from millions of years of evolution (idea being that evolution itself is nature's very own training algorithm, a computational process that creates genetic information), and online training in the form of nurture and environmental interaction -- and of course AI professors are saying the way to go is to research was to make online training possible for models. But the crux is that both kinds of "training" - almost a loaded term by now - are open areas of scientific research.
- PaulDavisThe1st 3y agoOK, so LLM's (a) have no pre-wiring (b) have no sensory connection but they can still spit out remarkably good language, and thus they must be a good model for humans and animals?