3 ms·
It’s not science. After two decades, zero predictions of any phenomena in nature. Please correct me if I’m mistaken. Performing a calculation that produces pa
by leephillips 3y ago
It’s not science.
After two decades, zero predictions of any phenomena in nature. Please correct me if I’m mistaken.
Performing a calculation that produces patterns that sort of resemble some natural forms is not a prediction of anything.
- JohnMunsch 3y agoYes, this. I read it back when it came back and while it drew many parallels between computed systems with very few rules and real world phenomena, it never really did more than show examples and say, "Look, look how similar this is, this could be a thing, right?" It was interesting and one of the best explorations of automata that I've seen, but I don't think anyone could draw any conclusions from it.