4 ms·

Take the comment above as an example of my work. Read it again. What was the writer disappointed by? (That's not a rhetorical question. That's a reading compr

by blagie 3y ago

Take the comment above as an example of my work. Read it again. What was the writer disappointed by? (That's not a rhetorical question. That's a reading comprehension question. Please post your answer)

gizajob 3y ago
Rising to your bait, it seems like you were disappointed by the plot. But your opening statement says you were "completely disappointed" which should be read as you were disappointed to a maximal degree by the whole thing. You then admit that the technical execution was great, but let down by plot, but we already know that you were let down "completely" and so the technical excellence is as good as worthless. So the tone of it reads as if this 16 year-old, even though he has made something amazing, is still a mere ant in comparison to your godlike powers of animation, modelling, rendering, plotting, pacing, and resolution of a one-minute movie.
- JustifyContent 3y ago
  Seems like you had an extreme misunderstanding of OP's original comment. The entire purpose of his comment was that this animation was excellent, but too short, meaning he wishes he could watch more of it. Hence his lighthearted "disappointment". Might want to re-read it.
- matsemann 3y ago
  You should probably read the comment again.. They're "disappointed" when it ended, because it was so good they wanted more.
- joshxyz 3y ago
  what the fuck are you smoking my man, chill out lol, he good!
- blagie 3y ago
  Thank you. I appreciate that you responded. Your free reading assessment: Your reading comprehension is similar to smaller and first-generation GPT-3 models. It is below that of more recent GPT-3 divinci models (e.g. text-divinci-3), gpt-3.5, or gpt-4. My recommendation: Find a way to remediate your reading skills, or be aware of the gap, and work with someone professional (one or two meetings is adequate, but with a serious background in managing these sorts of deficits) to develop coping mechanisms. The above is a serious assessment and recommendation. It's reasonable to make a mistake on a first read, but on a follow-up, especially reading in enough depth to analyze and break down the text (which I'm glad you did), you should have picked up on the meaning in this post unless there is some more serious underlying issue. The other posts show a fine job of how a normal person would read my comment. This does show a serious gap in foundational literacy. That's not an insult (we all have gaps). However, it's important we be aware of them, and either address them or develop coping mechanisms. There is a large number of disorders, such as autism, dyslexia, prosopagnosia, dyscalculia, etc. which manifest quite often as a very isolated gap (and I'm personally convinced there's a much broader set than in DSM-V, and we all have a few). Many very successful people have them, but generally only succeed with awareness and coping mechanisms. I can't diagnose from one post, but that's the sort of professional background I would look for, since at this point, it's very well understood. If there is a gap, they can help understand what it is, and bridging it can make a huge difference to your well-being, success, and happiness. This doesn't need to be a process, if you don't want one; being pointed in the right direction is often adequate (estimate effort in many similar cases I've seen: reading one book).
  - gizajob 3y ago
    If you fed your text into any GPT, it would conclude you were disappointed. There’s a thread of comments with yours the only one being “I am completely disappointed”. There’s not enough content in your post to signal a sufficient degree of irony amidst the context. Go look in the mirror before diagnosing others with spectrum disorders or personality disorders.
    - blagie 3y ago
      FYI: I ran my text through GPT before I posted, which is why I could tell you which models read this correctly, and which incorrectly. You may also wish to look at other responses to my post.

by blagie 3y ago

gizajob 3y ago

Rising to your bait, it seems like you were disappointed by the plot. But your opening statement says you were "completely disappointed" which should be read as you were disappointed to a maximal degree by the whole thing. You then admit that the technical execution was great, but let down by plot, but we already know that you were let down "completely" and so the technical excellence is as good as worthless. So the tone of it reads as if this 16 year-old, even though he has made something amazing, is still a mere ant in comparison to your godlike powers of animation, modelling, rendering, plotting, pacing, and resolution of a one-minute movie.

JustifyContent 3y ago
Seems like you had an extreme misunderstanding of OP's original comment. The entire purpose of his comment was that this animation was excellent, but too short, meaning he wishes he could watch more of it. Hence his lighthearted "disappointment". Might want to re-read it.
matsemann 3y ago
You should probably read the comment again.. They're "disappointed" when it ended, because it was so good they wanted more.
joshxyz 3y ago
what the fuck are you smoking my man, chill out lol, he good!
blagie 3y ago
Thank you. I appreciate that you responded. Your free reading assessment: Your reading comprehension is similar to smaller and first-generation GPT-3 models. It is below that of more recent GPT-3 divinci models (e.g. text-divinci-3), gpt-3.5, or gpt-4. My recommendation: Find a way to remediate your reading skills, or be aware of the gap, and work with someone professional (one or two meetings is adequate, but with a serious background in managing these sorts of deficits) to develop coping mechanisms. The above is a serious assessment and recommendation. It's reasonable to make a mistake on a first read, but on a follow-up, especially reading in enough depth to analyze and break down the text (which I'm glad you did), you should have picked up on the meaning in this post unless there is some more serious underlying issue. The other posts show a fine job of how a normal person would read my comment. This does show a serious gap in foundational literacy. That's not an insult (we all have gaps). However, it's important we be aware of them, and either address them or develop coping mechanisms. There is a large number of disorders, such as autism, dyslexia, prosopagnosia, dyscalculia, etc. which manifest quite often as a very isolated gap (and I'm personally convinced there's a much broader set than in DSM-V, and we all have a few). Many very successful people have them, but generally only succeed with awareness and coping mechanisms. I can't diagnose from one post, but that's the sort of professional background I would look for, since at this point, it's very well understood. If there is a gap, they can help understand what it is, and bridging it can make a huge difference to your well-being, success, and happiness. This doesn't need to be a process, if you don't want one; being pointed in the right direction is often adequate (estimate effort in many similar cases I've seen: reading one book).
- gizajob 3y ago
  If you fed your text into any GPT, it would conclude you were disappointed. There’s a thread of comments with yours the only one being “I am completely disappointed”. There’s not enough content in your post to signal a sufficient degree of irony amidst the context. Go look in the mirror before diagnosing others with spectrum disorders or personality disorders.
  - blagie 3y ago
    FYI: I ran my text through GPT before I posted, which is why I could tell you which models read this correctly, and which incorrectly. You may also wish to look at other responses to my post.