4 ms·
I don’t believe this is true in the Australian context though: > Australian animal industries are one of the lowest users of antimicrobials in the world https
by rmccue 3y ago
I don’t believe this is true in the Australian context though:
> Australian animal industries are one of the lowest users of antimicrobials in the world
https://www.amr.gov.au/about-amr/amr-australia/animal-health https://www.amr.gov.au/about-amr/amr-australia/animal-health
- knifie_spoonie 3y agoAnother commenter below posted this map: https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/antibiotic-usage-in-livestock https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/antibiotic-usage-in-lives... Assuming the data is accurate, it would seem antibiotic use (not sure how that compares with antimicrobials in general) is not particularly low compare to other countries.
- rmccue 3y agoInteresting! From the cited paper itself: > The top 5 consumers in 2020 were China, Brazil, India, USA, and Australia But also: > In contrast, Australia now also appears among the top 5 –however, in the absence of any public report of AMU since 2010 [29], usage for Australia was obtained through extrapolation, as with other countries that do not report data. Therefore, predictions may not accurately reflect the current country efforts to reduce AMU. So it's not clear if the data actually is accurate (and the paper really is about how accurate data is missing for many countries).