You're completely flipping the burden of proof - which is where your confusion is coming from. Elections are designed to be fair with about a million safeguard

You're completely flipping the burden of proof - which is where your confusion is coming from. Elections are designed to be fair with about a million safeguards in the leadup to voting day, the way votes are handled, and then the post-election activities. You need substantial evidence that broke some of the safeguards to say they weren't fair -- and you need to point to either coordinated methods of impropriety to claim they were rigged. Otherwise you get into this stupid "it's impossible to know what is true" freshman year philosophy nonsense that is both inaccurate and completely devoid of the ability to falsify.