> Sounds more like this is just an exhibit of the replication crisis Yeah. In the article we can find that "the original study recruited 30 Stanford University

> Sounds more like this is just an exhibit of the replication crisis Yeah. In the article we can find that "the original study recruited 30 Stanford University undergraduates (10 in each of the original 3 conditions, see Procedure)." I wouldn't think twice before throwing away the results and forgetting about them. The replication study does better, recruiting 132 participants. This is much harder to ignore.