2 ms·
I think even that is an oversimplification. These GPTs simplify Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) for the personal use case. You can provide "Knowledge" in t
by dudeinhawaii 3y ago
I think even that is an oversimplification. These GPTs simplify Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) for the personal use case. You can provide "Knowledge" in the form of files and also defined "actions" where have your GPT can take action or reach out to urls. This is a pretty strong step forward in terms of general use.
It's a great democratization of personal use AI and has everything you need to build useful personal bots. It could theoretically provide the same sort of utility as sites like ITTT but for GPT-4.
I can see power users creating workflows which trigger by talking to their GPT and telling it to "execute xyz". It then uses the actions and its 128k context to download some data (GET action), run some logic on it, and send the output via json to another endpoint via actions (POST action). With these simple components and a creative mind, you could build something interesting or perhaps automate your dayjob.
- icelancer 3y agoRight. The entire value is in a scaffolded CRUD application that simplifies RAG and API connectivity. Now, this doesn't work as well as I'd like it to, but I have reason to believe it'll improve over time. Getting simple retrieval/RAG and API connections to GPT is what every analyst has been asking for since it came out. Now they're making progress here and capturing everyone at $20/month (well, when signups are back) to use this feature set. The actual prompting and all the grifting going on with "AWESOME PROMPTS" are useless, of course. Mostly. It's in the private distribution of these GPTs to co-workers and employees with updated knowledge files and likely a custom omni-API that can be hit by the GPT.