Indeed that is an interesting philosophy question. For humans though, their capacity is limited by biology. Some are for sure expert manipulators, but if the

Indeed that is an interesting philosophy question. For humans though, their capacity is limited by biology. Some are for sure expert manipulators, but if the coming expectations are correct, even the most talented human will be like an ant pushing an elephant at ability with AI. Even just in volume today an AI manipulator could work on millions of people at a time, even coordinating efforts between people, whereas a human is much more limited in scale. But yeah, it would be nice as a listener to be able to see every speakers biases up front! Horrific privacy implications though, particularly since we aren't really in control of our thoughts[1]. [1] Robert Sapolsky's new book "Determined" is absolutely incredible, and I highly recommend it