The effect I'm referring to is extraterritorial. It's sometimes a surprise to foreigners because there can be a mistaken belief that specifying a particular non

The effect I'm referring to is extraterritorial. It's sometimes a surprise to foreigners because there can be a mistaken belief that specifying a particular non-US datacentre for cloud services places the data stored therein under the domestic (local, non-US) legal system and outside of US jurisdiction with respect to s.702 monitoring. Section 702 requests are still used, even for countries like the UK and Australia who have signed their own executive agreements under the US CLOUD Act. (The new Trans-Atlantic Data Privacy Framework and its Data Protection Review Court is a different ball of wax.)