3 ms·
I absolutely buy this but also think we should figure out what works about the human tutor and try to get it into a free piece of software so that the 99% of ki
by rgbrgb 3y ago
I absolutely buy this but also think we should figure out what works about the human tutor and try to get it into a free piece of software so that the 99% of kids without individual tutors can get a similar benefit.
- keiferski 3y agoI'm not sure it's something that can be replicated by software. Human beings like human beings. Physicality isn't just an add-on, it's fundamental to who we are. A person sitting next to you explaining something is much, much different than someone or some thing teaching you via a device. An AI tutor that passes the Turing Test and communicates via speech is roughly comparable to an anonymous human teacher teaching via Zoom. There's no physicality and no continuity to the relationship. To use an example: my high school history teacher was an old ex-Marine with a buzz cut and big square glasses. I enjoyed his class because he was a cool guy who seemed to have seen the world, and I was interested in what he had to say about wars and historical events. With an AI, no matter how realistic it is, there is zero of this context. Sure, it can pretend to be a grizzled ex-marine. But who cares what it thinks? A teenager is going to find it lame and boring, not equivalent to an interesting individual tutor.
- rgbrgb 3y ago> no physicality So it requires embodiment? Rodney Brooks might agree. You're saying it like it can't be done, but I'm hearing it just requires hardware. > no continuity Feels like a very tractable software problem.