3 ms·
It's a model of a model? And it turns out to be better? That's so counter-intuitive I'm kinda amazed anyone even bothered to research it, let alone that it wo
by flir 3y ago
It's a model of a model?
And it turns out to be better?
That's so counter-intuitive I'm kinda amazed anyone even bothered to research it, let alone that it worked.
Uh..... now do horse racing.
- uoaei 3y ago"All models are wrong, some models are useful." Some are more wrong and more useful simultaneously ;) This is actually the typical state of things in numerical simulation: we have infinite-resolution differential equations modeling such physical systems, but to implement them in silico we need to discretize and approximate various aspects of those models to achieve usefulness re: time and accuracy. Google has merely gone one level further in the tradeoff. For more info on Google's approach, look into surrogate models. It's becoming more common especially in things like weather and geology.