I think there is nothing more vacuous than taxonomy arguments (though they can be fun). Kent Pitman (KMP), for example, is on record as saying that Scheme is n

I think there is nothing more vacuous than taxonomy arguments (though they can be fun). Kent Pitman (KMP), for example, is on record as saying that Scheme is not a Lisp[1] 1: https://groups.google.com/g/comp.lang.lisp/c/Bj8Hx6mZEYI/m/6AWmNEwQR5YJ https://groups.google.com/g/comp.lang.lisp/c/Bj8Hx6mZEYI/m/6... (besides the inevitable flamewar started by @lisper's question, there's actually some good discussion between the "adults in the room" well downthread of what I linked).