3 ms·
The determination of probable cause has nothing to do with whether the invasion of privacy/warrant is "absolutely needed" or not. The FBI's position is that tha
by ethanbond 3y ago
The determination of probable cause has nothing to do with whether the invasion of privacy/warrant is "absolutely needed" or not. The FBI's position is that that should be a consideration.
- toomuchtodo 3y agoThey have proven themselves unworthy of this power and legal exception process. > He did address the FBI's earlier abuses of Section 702 to spy on protesters, campaign donors, and even elected officials. > "To be sure, no one more deeply shares Members' concerns regarding past FBI compliance violations related to FISA, including the rules for querying Section 702 collection using US person identifiers, than I do," Wray said. > The FBI "responded rigorously" to these violations, he added, and that already "dramatically" reduced the 702 searches on US persons, he added. > "Moreover, as we publicly announced in June, the FBI is implementing further measures both to keep improving our compliance and to hold our personnel accountable for misuse of Section 702 and other FISA provisions, including through an escalating scheme for employee accountability, including discipline and culminating in possible dismissal." Anchorman Ron Burgundy I don't believe you meme here.
- ethanbond 3y agoI mean... there obviously shouldn't be an exception to the legal process. That's the whole point of the legal process. GP was suggesting that exception should still exist and they should just use it selectively, which of course is the entire debate.