> That said, the semantics of the word "is" in natural language really doesn't matter in this debate. As a logician, do you consider this necessarily factual:

> That said, the semantics of the word "is" in natural language really doesn't matter in this debate. As a logician, do you consider this necessarily factual: - using ternary logic and/or (I am asking both independently and in combination) - considering the numerous possibilities for ambiguity in "doesn't matter"?