> Apple seems to be the more actionable company to sue, since Apple actually controls the market of “default search engine on iOS”. Even in the absence of paym

> Apple seems to be the more actionable company to sue, since Apple actually controls the market of “default search engine on iOS”. Even in the absence of payments, Apple would still be entirely within its rights to set Google as the default search provider, which is why the lawsuit isn’t about Apple. It’s about the set of things that Google has done to inhibit search competition, only one of which is paying Apple for default placement.