4 ms·
That would barely address the articles concerns, as those warheads still need storage, still cost money, still generate waste, still require environmental impac
by nickelpro 3y ago
That would barely address the articles concerns, as those warheads still need storage, still cost money, still generate waste, still require environmental impact reports for their construction, movement, and storage.
The actual, physical silo is only about a third of what this article takes issue with. The overwhelming majority is focused on its nature as a nuclear silo, and the nuclear aspect doesn't change even if you get rid of the silo.