Same could be said about Twitter. Listen, you add a bunch of employees, some of them executives and a nice office with a caffeteria and you get easily over thi

Same could be said about Twitter. Listen, you add a bunch of employees, some of them executives and a nice office with a caffeteria and you get easily over this number. I think what people get wrong is what is profit for Truth Social. People who own and operate it do not think about profit as the money they get from the platform directly or through advertising, the profit is in having an alternative social circle where they can gather their follower base and reach them without being impeded by "censorship" from a platform like Twitter (sorry, X is just a ridiculous name). In times past billionaires would keep their own newspapers even if unprofitable on paper just because they could create their own spin on the current events. That ability to control the narrative can be worth more than the cost of propping up a failing enterprise. If you understand this, you might find that this thing actually is quite profitable.