4 ms·
The closest agreement you're likely to get is that a person existed who was a model for the accounts that follow. His divinity is a matter of opinion and nothi
by pstuart 3y ago
The closest agreement you're likely to get is that a person existed who was a model for the accounts that follow.
His divinity is a matter of opinion and nothing more.
- jhbadger 3y agoI realize that, but I object to the idea that the historical Jesus had to exist and that there is "no debate" to it when there don't seem to be any documents mentioning him from when he was supposed to have lived. I realize there could be reasons for this -- the Romans and/or Jewish authorities could have found and destroyed all such documents, but the fact is without the existence of such documents even the historical Jesus is dubious.