And why would this article be arbitrarily flagged? I mean, it opens debate, regardless of how anyone may not like the idea of debate over this "closed" subject,

And why would this article be arbitrarily flagged? I mean, it opens debate, regardless of how anyone may not like the idea of debate over this "closed" subject, and it comes from a very reputable source. The Washington Post has its political biases sure, but it's hardly infowars-level bottom barrel reporting.