3 ms·
> The more of the web that is LLM generated, then the more new models will be trained on generated data, and will fuzz out And yet it's so obvious that a rando
by fkyoureadthedoc 3y ago
> The more of the web that is LLM generated, then the more new models will be trained on generated data, and will fuzz out
And yet it's so obvious that a random Hackernews independently discovers it and repeats it on every Chat GPT post, and prophesies it as some inevitable future. Not could happen, will happen. The clueless researchers will be blindsided by this of course, they'll never see it coming from their ivory tower.
And yes Chat GPT fails to write code that runs all the time. But it's not very interesting to talk about without an example.
- FrustratedMonky 3y agoHow? It isn't exactly easy to re-produce these examples. I'd have to write a few pages to document and explain it. And scrub it to remove anything too internal, so create a vanilla example of the bug. And then it would be too long to go into a post, so what then, I'd have to go sign up to blog it somewhere and link to it. I'm not arguing that GPT is bad. Just that it is as susceptible to rabbit wholes as any human. I'm actually having a hard time narrowing down where your frustration is aimed. At naysayers? At those that don't put effort into documenting? At GPT itself? Or that a news site on the internet dares have repetition ?