3 ms·

So the choice was not screening for it. Regardless, without moralizing, a choice was made. This is a shocked pikachu situation. [edit] The fact is we've had th

So the choice was not screening for it. Regardless, without moralizing, a choice was made. This is a shocked pikachu situation. [edit] The fact is we've had this kind of content for a long time, and we've developed techniques for identifying and removing it. There's great nudity detecting ML models. I suspect the choice was made in part ideologically, and in part to drive sensationalist coverage, and it looks like it's working.

brucethemoose2 3y ago
They do "screen" it in a way. All the models are categorized and tagged, and I think straight up illegal models are moderated out.
dragonwriter 3y ago
> So the choice was not screening for it No, they screen, remove, and ban people for policy violations. (And that has improved over time, at least, the violations that have slipped through have dropped over time.) What isn't a policy violation is separate things which could be combined together or with other things to make something that would be a policy violations.