4 ms·

The Washington Post put out some investigative reporting detailing this: https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2023/11/11/nordstream-bombing-ukraine-

• jacquesm 3y ago
  It's very far away from anything that you could call proof. Read carefully: besides the title the whole article is full of disclaimers. Already on line two "say people familiar with planning" -> but not who those people are. Anonymity, 'people familiar with his role', that bit is repeated over and over. I'll reserve my skepticism until there is hard proof and even then: if it turns out that this was a rogue action how much weight should be attached to it? Does that rule out some invisible paymaster? Ukraine top government officials have denied involvement and knowledge of involvement and that's where it stands for now. The article would have been improved if it had said 'Allegedly' in the title, which given the thin sourcing is not a minor oversight.