3 ms·
Greater understanding is never pointless. Throwing around general accusations of fads doesn’t reduce a paper to part of a fad. Papers stand on their own merits
by Nevermark 3y ago
Greater understanding is never pointless.
Throwing around general accusations of fads doesn’t reduce a paper to part of a fad. Papers stand on their own merits, based on their reasoning, independent if any associations with fads.
I expect the properties of a black hole are simply a convenient context to talk about the holographic principle.
If the holographic principle holds true, it is true across any border separating one space from another.
Likewise, mathematicians prove things about infinities, which we will never encounter directly, but which have useful implications for things in math that can relate to things we might create or encounter.
- thomashop 3y agoI think the comment you are responding to was a joke
- bee_rider 3y agoThe time police insist that I inform everyone that my post about accidentally posting across timelines is, in fact, just a joke, nothing serious, haha.
- KineticLensman 3y agoThis is how you lose the time war...
- bee_rider 3y agoLuckily as a pro-paradoxian, knowing how I lose the time war is the first step in winning the time war.
- Nevermark 3y agoOf course! Once you know you are going to lose the time war you just rotate and reflect your polarity through your current Lorentzian manifold point to switch sides and win. The trusty eternal Möbius Timeline Gambit. Never invented, just reused and reused ...