3 ms·

Does a default judgment (no show) set any citable precedent?

• jfoutz 3y ago
  Not a lawyer. I'd imagine if they rack up a bunch of no-shows They could change their dmca handling process. We're not honoring these without property X, because these last hundred or thousand or whatever turned out to be fake. I guess, I'd assert google lawyers are not dumb, and they probably have a reason to start stacking "wins". But I don't know what the strategy or end goal might be. I'm just some random guy on the internet with an opinion.
  • tyingq 3y ago
    That makes sense to me. "Procedural precedent + metrics" versus actual legal precedent.
• bluGill 3y ago
  Not really. Sure you can refer to them, but the first lawyer who shows up will point out the others were no shows and the judge won't pay much attention to results.