2 ms·

This isn't to deal with multi-minute power deficits in split grids. That is dealt with with fast acting generation or load shedding. Solar and wind systems t

This isn't to deal with multi-minute power deficits in split grids. That is dealt with with fast acting generation or load shedding. Solar and wind systems today typically do not have a voltage setpoint or control loop. That's because there is no big gas/steam valve to adjust the amount of power generated. The operator wants to inject all the power from the sun/wind into the grid, whatever the voltage. An X% droop would be X% of the total generated energy wasted in the name of stability. Thats a lot of money, and they won't waste it unless required to. Instead, power deficits in the 10's of millisecond range can be dealt with by inverters (which typically have storage capacitors for ~20ms worth of output). This covers large fault currents, and sudden inflows as bits of grid are reconnected. Unfortunately, most of today's inverters, which have the capability to do that, will not, due to having code which will only operate the 'happy case'.

applied_heat 3y ago
> Solar inverters can produce/absorb reactive power easily > Solar and wind systems today typically do not have a voltage setpoint or control loop. That's because there is no big gas/steam valve to adjust the amount of power generated. The operator wants to inject all the power from the sun/wind into the grid, whatever the voltage. reactive power being easily controlled is the same as a voltage control loop with droop when connected to a larger system. Control of the traditional prime mover by way of devices like steam throttle valve controls real power (MW) and not voltage or reactive power (MVAR). I am curious how an inverter operating away from unity power factor fails to deliver roughly the identical amount of energy as at unity. Can you provide a link that explains it? Traditional generators pump out the same MW barring losses due to increased current no matter the power factor. MW in mechanical * efficiency = MW out electrical. And of course there is a limit to how out of phase the voltage and current waveforms can be, usually +/- 0.9 pf. A 60Hz cycle is 16.7 ms, A 13 kV breaker takes 80ms to open, to detect a fault (except for differential element) let alone clear it takes a lot longer than 20ms.

applied_heat 3y ago

> Solar inverters can produce/absorb reactive power easily > Solar and wind systems today typically do not have a voltage setpoint or control loop. That's because there is no big gas/steam valve to adjust the amount of power generated. The operator wants to inject all the power from the sun/wind into the grid, whatever the voltage. reactive power being easily controlled is the same as a voltage control loop with droop when connected to a larger system. Control of the traditional prime mover by way of devices like steam throttle valve controls real power (MW) and not voltage or reactive power (MVAR). I am curious how an inverter operating away from unity power factor fails to deliver roughly the identical amount of energy as at unity. Can you provide a link that explains it? Traditional generators pump out the same MW barring losses due to increased current no matter the power factor. MW in mechanical * efficiency = MW out electrical. And of course there is a limit to how out of phase the voltage and current waveforms can be, usually +/- 0.9 pf. A 60Hz cycle is 16.7 ms, A 13 kV breaker takes 80ms to open, to detect a fault (except for differential element) let alone clear it takes a lot longer than 20ms.