3 ms·

Given Truth Social brought in something like 2.3M during that time, it’s more that their investors are paying his legal fees. I get to thinking, “who is stupid

Given Truth Social brought in something like 2.3M during that time, it’s more that their investors are paying his legal fees. I get to thinking, “who is stupid enough to be doing this?” And admittedly without any evidence, I then wonder if this is what “being funded by foreign interests” looks like.

pjc50 3y ago
There's quite a large number of people who were close to Trump in his previous campaign who were convicted of offenses related to "unregistered foreign agents", around Manafort. This does not hurt his chances of re-election. At this point I think even a conviction wouldn't hurt him more than a fraction of a percent.
- lesuorac 3y ago
  If Trump loses only a fraction of a percent in 2024 he still loses.
dashundchen 3y ago
I still want to know the full extent of Jared Kushner's work in Saudi Arabia, acting as a senior policy advisor hired by Trump. We know about the $100 billion dollar Saudi arms deal that Kushner inserted himself in after the murder of Jamal Khashoggi. We know he personally backed Saudi Arabi in their conflict with Qatar. We know Kushner failed to disclose he owed around a billion dollars on failed investments in real estate. Now after Kushner leaves government, MBS overrode his advisors to hand over $2 billion of state investment to Kushner's newly established fund. What happened there?
- onetokeoverthe 3y ago
  [dead]
- polski-g 3y ago
  Like father, like son: https://www.northjersey.com/story/news/new-jersey/2020/12/23/prosecuted-chris-christie-charles-kushner-pardoned-donald-trump/4034767001/ https://www.northjersey.com/story/news/new-jersey/2020/12/23...
thworp 3y ago
As a European the "X is a foreign Y" trope in your politics has always amused me. Both of your parties are constantly involved in corrupt foreign dealings (that would be decade-defining scandals in some other countries) and there are never any real consequences. Nixon and Kissigner went behind the back of the sitting president to torpedo his peace talks with North Vietnam. Basically they commited high treason (secretly conferring with the enemy) and Nixon admitted as much. Decades later Kissinger is still considered a role model of a diplomat in some circles. That example was picked so as not to kick off a political discussion. I'm
- Waterluvian 3y ago
  1. Completely 100% agree. The United States has a significant history of destroying governments and meddling in murderous ways purely because they believed the ends justified the means. 2. But that doesn't mean "X is a foreign Y" isn't still significant or also wrong. 3. And just for the record, I'm actually a Disenfranchised American without the right to vote, aka. Canadian.
- rewmie 3y ago
  > Decades later Kissinger is still considered a role model of a diplomat in some circles. Honestly, why wouldn't he be? I think the mistake you're making is presuming that a role model of a diplomat is determined by your notion of morality. The definition of "diplomacy" is "spoken or written communication by representatives of states (such as leaders and diplomats) intended to influence events in the international system", and the job description of a diplomat is "a person appointed by a state or an intergovernmental institution (...) to conduct diplomacy." Knowing this, and knowing a bit of Kissinger's legacy, it's hard to disagree that he's one of the most successful and influential diplomats in history. He's been directly involved in all the critical events that determined the course of humanity during the 20th century, and he personally influenced or determined their outcome. You might argue over your views on morality and Kissinger's legacy, but it is not possible to reject the fact that Kissinger is perhaps the top diplomat of the 20th century.
  - thworp 3y ago
atkailash 3y ago
[dead]

pjc50 3y ago

There's quite a large number of people who were close to Trump in his previous campaign who were convicted of offenses related to "unregistered foreign agents", around Manafort. This does not hurt his chances of re-election. At this point I think even a conviction wouldn't hurt him more than a fraction of a percent.

lesuorac 3y ago
If Trump loses only a fraction of a percent in 2024 he still loses.

dashundchen 3y ago

I still want to know the full extent of Jared Kushner's work in Saudi Arabia, acting as a senior policy advisor hired by Trump. We know about the $100 billion dollar Saudi arms deal that Kushner inserted himself in after the murder of Jamal Khashoggi. We know he personally backed Saudi Arabi in their conflict with Qatar. We know Kushner failed to disclose he owed around a billion dollars on failed investments in real estate. Now after Kushner leaves government, MBS overrode his advisors to hand over $2 billion of state investment to Kushner's newly established fund. What happened there?

onetokeoverthe 3y ago
[dead]
polski-g 3y ago
Like father, like son: https://www.northjersey.com/story/news/new-jersey/2020/12/23/prosecuted-chris-christie-charles-kushner-pardoned-donald-trump/4034767001/ https://www.northjersey.com/story/news/new-jersey/2020/12/23...

thworp 3y ago

As a European the "X is a foreign Y" trope in your politics has always amused me. Both of your parties are constantly involved in corrupt foreign dealings (that would be decade-defining scandals in some other countries) and there are never any real consequences. Nixon and Kissigner went behind the back of the sitting president to torpedo his peace talks with North Vietnam. Basically they commited high treason (secretly conferring with the enemy) and Nixon admitted as much. Decades later Kissinger is still considered a role model of a diplomat in some circles. That example was picked so as not to kick off a political discussion. I'm

Waterluvian 3y ago
1. Completely 100% agree. The United States has a significant history of destroying governments and meddling in murderous ways purely because they believed the ends justified the means. 2. But that doesn't mean "X is a foreign Y" isn't still significant or also wrong. 3. And just for the record, I'm actually a Disenfranchised American without the right to vote, aka. Canadian.
rewmie 3y ago
> Decades later Kissinger is still considered a role model of a diplomat in some circles. Honestly, why wouldn't he be? I think the mistake you're making is presuming that a role model of a diplomat is determined by your notion of morality. The definition of "diplomacy" is "spoken or written communication by representatives of states (such as leaders and diplomats) intended to influence events in the international system", and the job description of a diplomat is "a person appointed by a state or an intergovernmental institution (...) to conduct diplomacy." Knowing this, and knowing a bit of Kissinger's legacy, it's hard to disagree that he's one of the most successful and influential diplomats in history. He's been directly involved in all the critical events that determined the course of humanity during the 20th century, and he personally influenced or determined their outcome. You might argue over your views on morality and Kissinger's legacy, but it is not possible to reject the fact that Kissinger is perhaps the top diplomat of the 20th century.
- thworp 3y ago

atkailash 3y ago

[dead]