2 ms·
More of the old. They're still clenching their "modern C++" that we'll see responsible for 80% of vulnerabilities in the future. In a sane world it would be re
by devwastaken 3y ago
More of the old. They're still clenching their "modern C++" that we'll see responsible for 80% of vulnerabilities in the future.
In a sane world it would be required by law to develop and use safe designs, starting with safer languages. You don't get to build a bridge you know will collapse and avoid the consequences. As govs continue to understand tech and apply the laws they conveniently forgot about, orgs will be held accountable.
- teleforce 3y agoI assumed you meant why not using Rust? I guess Rust is not a silver bullet for secure application and the last thing they want to do is to force everyone to convert to Rust or D language for HPC [1]. [1] Deploying Containerized Applications on Secure Large Scale HPC Production Systems: https://archive.fosdem.org/2021/schedule/event/containerized_hpc/ https://archive.fosdem.org/2021/schedule/event/containerized...