2 ms·
Swift was advocating for topics she felt passionate about and had some level of firsthand exposure. I’m glad she doesn’t opine on how government surveillance is
by hipadev23 3y ago
Swift was advocating for topics she felt passionate about and had some level of firsthand exposure. I’m glad she doesn’t opine on how government surveillance is funded.
Also her reach is far larger than all MSM combined, she doesn’t have to follow what they do, they follow her.
- agentgumshoe 3y agoShe doesn't even have to opine, she could just state how important the policy decision could be and make sure people are aware of it.