3 ms·
> voting for and against the causes celebs put up Thereby turning every issue into a cause célèbre. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cause_c%C3%A9l%C3%A8bre http
by panarky 3y ago
> voting for and against the causes celebs put up
Thereby turning every issue into a cause célèbre.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cause_c%C3%A9l%C3%A8bre https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cause_c%C3%A9l%C3%A8bre
- jauntywundrkind 3y agoI feel like you have it backwards. You're saying that democratic involvement would make these issues cause celebres. But celebrities in many cases already have the power to make a cause a cause celebre. That's part of what being a celebrity and using your name & fame is. We already live in the world you describe. I'm proposing here a thought experiment where, rather than letting the public arena and media suss out how to play the story, let the cause go on indefinitely, the public gets a direct vote. My actual hope was the opposite of what you say: rather than leaving the media cycle around celebrities rumble on indefinitely, there'd be some discrete feedback events, checkin points where we can decide whether this de-facto cause celebre is - to borrow from a magazine - wired tired or expired. My hope was democracy might take power back from the 4th estate & celebrities.