4 ms·
>While strong AI might be one path to achieving AGI, there is no scientific consensus on methods for determining whether machines possess strong AI attributes s
by optimalsolver 3y ago
>While strong AI might be one path to achieving AGI, there is no scientific consensus on methods for determining whether machines possess strong AI attributes such as consciousness
Maybe we should employ the methods we use to ascertain that fellow human beings are conscious entities with subjective experience?
Also, consciousness probably optional for intelligence:
https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/HsRFQTAySAx8xbXEc/nonsentient-optimizers https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/HsRFQTAySAx8xbXEc/nonsentien...
- ben_w 3y ago> Maybe we should employ the methods we use to ascertain that fellow human beings are conscious entities with subjective experience. Historically, this has frequently included refusing to accept $outgroup are real people with any subjective experience (or at least, any that matters). I'd like us to do better — not that I can actually suggest any test that would do this objectively, but I would like us to do better.
- olalonde 3y agoAs a philosophical zombie, I believe consciousness is just a myth.
- PeterisP 3y ago> Maybe we should employ the methods we use to ascertain that fellow human beings are conscious entities with subjective experience? What methods? Are there any? Is there suddenly some consensus among philosophers about the p-zombie thought experiment? AFAIK effectively the best we can do is (a) ascertain that you yourself are a conscious entity with subjective experience and then (b) assume - with no way to ascertain that - that the humans around you are like you.