2 ms·
This isn't a contradiction to the improv model. It fits it perfectly. And being in a position not to be able to judge the output you receive by your own admiss
by ericjmorey 3y ago
This isn't a contradiction to the improv model. It fits it perfectly. And being in a position not to be able to judge the output you receive by your own admission makes me question why you're so impressed with the output.
- __MatrixMan__ 3y agoI'm impressed because when I verify it against the textbook it ends up being correct. I'd love to have time to just read the whole textbook, but ChatGPT uses words that appear in the index, so I end up reading only the parts I don't already know (twice, once as phrased by ChatGPT, a second time while verifying it). It feels like a better way to learn because you're not in passive-absorb-info mode for long periods. Instead you're in a much more active mode of alternating between asking questions, being critical of new info, and then confirm/denying it. Certainly not better than 1:1 instruction, but better than a lecture where there's only time to ask/answer two or three of your questions.