We're not talking about some survey of self-reported symptoms of nausea with N=113. We're talking about satellite data, glaciers, permafrost, ice cores, tree ri

We're not talking about some survey of self-reported symptoms of nausea with N=113. We're talking about satellite data, glaciers, permafrost, ice cores, tree rings, tide buoys, written historical records, weather stations, geologic records, bird migration patterns, extinctions, even human experience in a single lifespan. (And yes, of course, computer models). We're talking about ecologists, geologists, atmospheric scientists, space scientists, biologists, foresters, environmentalists, militaries, space agencies, researchers from every nation on Earth. There is just no room for doubt anymore, except motivated denialists and conspiracy theorists. The questions that remain are how fast it is happening, how quickly we can adapt, and whether any political change is possible to avoid its worst effects. I personally take umbrage at the suggestion that Science is somehow populated by fraudsters, crackpots, and failures. When in reality all that I have seen is the Science is populated by anxious, detail-oriented people who are extremely embarrassed to be caught making mistakes and are generally extremely cautious. Do mistakes occur? Yes. Do misrepresentations occur? Sometimes. Does fraud occur? Extraordinarily rarely. And in all of these cases Science has a culture of dealing with honest mistakes, of dealing with distortions and misunderstandings, and punishing fraud. It's career-ending to be a fraudster in Science. Unlike most of what culture seems to be devolving towards today, which just shovels more BS and gaslighting. Science is doing its best with imperfect people to move forward. It's all based on reproducibility and banishing the bullshitting.