3 ms·
Answering a sub question of yours: Indeed the only way to use more than one core in OCaML is to use multiprocessing. If there is a lot of data that needs to be
by srean 15y ago
Answering a sub question of yours: Indeed the only way to use more than one core in OCaML is to use multiprocessing. If there is a lot of data that needs to be exchanged, it may not be very fast.
That said there is this patched up version (funded by a one off summer of code by Jane street, I think)
http://www.algo-prog.info/ocmc/ http://www.algo-prog.info/ocmc/
that gives an API for using threads. I am fairly new to OCaML so will not be able to provide details. Another language that I am looking at is Felix
http://felix-lang.org:8080/ http://felix-lang.org:8080/ (Note the port, its not the one that the search engines will give you).
I am ok with OCaML not giving its users a threading API but a runtime that executes many of its higher-order functions in parallel would be really nice. Well, higher-order functions and the other parallelism exposed by the functional semantics, with some helpful directives from the user of course.
- gtani 15y agoThere's been a lot of projects, of which the ocamlnet/netmulticore and Jane St async's are (I think, but not very confidently) the only current. Others are: poly/ML, ocamlP3, OC4MC, functory, JoCaml coThreads, LWT http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/q9cro/real_world_ocaml_book_on_ocaml_coming_in_the_fall/c3xu3xj http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/q9cro/real_worl... http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6588500/what-is-the-state-of-ocamls-parallelization-abilities http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6588500/what-is-the-state...
- deleted 15y ago[deleted]