It’s a matter of the corpus at hand and the predictability of a human vs. a computer. With more training and improved algorithms, the computer can reach a high

It’s a matter of the corpus at hand and the predictability of a human vs. a computer. With more training and improved algorithms, the computer can reach a high rate of accurate “improvisation”, at which point it doesn’t matter if it’s improv or not. My issue is with using improv to augment our mental models of LLMs, and I don’t agree that this is the end result. Taking this analogy too far misleads us about LLMs.