5 ms·
It sounds like you agree then and its only a matter of the corpus at hand. An improv actor would be called a comedian if they tried to interpolate based on spo
by peteradio 3y ago
It sounds like you agree then and its only a matter of the corpus at hand. An improv actor would be called a comedian if they tried to interpolate based on spotty context.
- haswell 3y agoIt’s a matter of the corpus at hand and the predictability of a human vs. a computer. With more training and improved algorithms, the computer can reach a high rate of accurate “improvisation”, at which point it doesn’t matter if it’s improv or not. My issue is with using improv to augment our mental models of LLMs, and I don’t agree that this is the end result. Taking this analogy too far misleads us about LLMs.