> And before anyone chimes in with arguments about examples of righteous crusades against genuine problems in the world sparked by a single person… the obvious

> And before anyone chimes in with arguments about examples of righteous crusades against genuine problems in the world sparked by a single person… the obvious counterpoint is that these people [stop being “one single person” when they convince someone else in a one to one conversation] - > good arguments persuade people and gather people around them… [one lone voice arguing against the consensus is a crank who should be ignored without guilt]. Self-refuting "logic" like this is what we need much less of if you ask me.