4 ms·
I don't really understand their portfolio at all. 700+ positions (comically overdiversified), top 2 holdings is the S&P and an emerging markets ETF that make u
by tempsy 3y ago
I don't really understand their portfolio at all.
700+ positions (comically overdiversified), top 2 holdings is the S&P and an emerging markets ETF that make up 11% of the portfolio.
Why does anyone pay a premium for this over holding the S&P or a total world ETF.
https://hedgefollow.com/funds/Bridgewater+Associates https://hedgefollow.com/funds/Bridgewater+Associates
- smallnamespace 3y agoIf you think they are good at picking winners at scale then many small bets makes sense, like a VC fund. Of course it's harder to tell if they're doing any work since they're not private investments, but many VC funds also ride coattails without adding much alpha.
- toomuchtodo 3y agohttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oFPMvlLlkyY https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oFPMvlLlkyY Less than five minutes, but gets the point across. Skip to 2:50 for visual.
- tempsy 3y agoThis is not anything like a VC fund. 700+ positions in mostly large mature companies is so overly diversified that it would be near impossible to deviate too far from S&P or a world index.
- yieldcrv 3y agoin my experience investing in hedge funds, there is no accurate way to tell what an individual investor actually gets the reference performance from fund inception is a pretty poor proxy if you were not a limited partner from inception side pockets can be the greatest of all time