The llama.cpp author thinks security is "very low priority and almost unnecessary". https://github.com/ggerganov/llama.cpp/pull/651#pullrequestreview-1368052138

The llama.cpp author thinks security is "very low priority and almost unnecessary". https://github.com/ggerganov/llama.cpp/pull/651#pullrequestreview-1368052138 https://github.com/ggerganov/llama.cpp/pull/651#pullrequestr... So I'm not sure why a sandbox would bundle llama.cpp and claim to be secure. They would need more evidence than this to make such a claim.