3 ms·
Notice how shi*y companies always seem to find that "unfairness" needs to be "fixed" by removing the benefit?
by twh270 3y ago
Notice how shi*y companies always seem to find that "unfairness" needs to be "fixed" by removing the benefit?
- runamuck 3y ago*Every company
- _moof 3y agoSimilar to how the solution to work/life imbalance is never less work.
- konschubert 3y agoWhat else is it?
- some_random 3y agoPizza parties of course /s
- Arrath 3y agoLetting the staff go absolutely ape-shit on the latest MFC that just refuses to print or scan correctly, once per quarter.
- toast0 3y agoIt's not just companies. I've seen lots of people say why do they get X? rather than how can we get X? As an example, Pinball and arcade games are often very easy to source. Where I've seen them at my workplace, they were brought in and maintained by employees. Some space needs to be allocated, and maybe needs a bit of electrical work if a high density arcade forms, but otherwise... May be different if there's no collectors in the employee base, or in countries where machines are scarce.
- twh270 3y agoYeah, the "if I can't have X you shouldn't have it either" mentality. These people are a joy to be around, they get a twisted sense of satisfaction when they manage to get X removed. I'm like, go get some therapy for that.
- toast0 3y agoI mean, If I can't have it, you shouldn't have it is kind of ok-ish; but it's when they skip trying to get X and just short circuit to you have X and I don't, let's get rid of your X that bothers me.