4 ms·
Following that rationale, why haven’t we kept using H.264, when H.265 started existing?
by Diti 3y ago
Following that rationale, why haven’t we kept using H.264, when H.265 started existing?
- crazygringo 3y agoWe absolutely did. H.265 took many years to gain traction, precisely because h.264 hardware decoding was widespread but h.265 hardware decoding wasn't. Codecs simply don't take off in a big way until the hardware decoding becomes widespread. And video sites will maintain dual streams for many years, to continue supporting older hardware.
- ksec 3y ago>Following that rationale, why haven’t we kept using H.264, when H.265 started existing? If my memory are correct at the end of 2020 90%+ of all online video were still on H.264. We are still pretty much H.264 only simply because it is good enough for most things.
- JamesSwift 3y ago_everyone_ uses 264 as the baseline fallback because every device under the sun supports it.