3 ms·
> Having a disability or similar does not entitle you to an unsubsidized Times Square with no ads. Isn't Times Square public property? NYC could absolutely mak
by CivBase 3y ago
> Having a disability or similar does not entitle you to an unsubsidized Times Square with no ads.
Isn't Times Square public property? NYC could absolutely make that a thing if they wanted.
> How the heck can you require only Netflix to host 30% local EU content and also demand free video streaming service with no ads?
Nobody's asking to make Netflix free. YouTube could absolutely charge for access if they wanted. Ads aren't the only way to monetize a service.
With that said, I'm generally in agreement that Google has a right to run ads on their platform and to try to block users who are blocking ads. The "spyware" argument seems pretty weak to me.