4 ms·
Not slightly interested. My point is: we have tools that fit the problem better instead of supporting the hype train of rust.
by RamblingCTO 3y ago
Not slightly interested. My point is: we have tools that fit the problem better instead of supporting the hype train of rust.
- jamincan 3y agoWhat do you suggest would be better? Command-line tools, parsing and parallelism are all things that Rust excels at.
- RamblingCTO 3y agoWhy on earth would you need object lifecycle mem management for these things? These are points where Go excels as well. Rust is meant as a systems language, I'd love to have it as a general purpose lang as well, but it's not imho.
- crabmusket 3y agoSo you think Rust is a bad choice because... the programmers will need to deal with the borrow checker? I think it's been demonstrated that programmers are fine with that.