3 ms·
Could you please elaborate on the security implications?
by ikurei 3y ago
Could you please elaborate on the security implications?
- wokwokwok 3y agoIt’s as secure as any C++ backend that performs no input validation. Ie. whatever memory safety or sandbox you had from using wasm or rust is gone when you use it.
- jart 3y agoThe llama.cpp author thinks security is "very low priority and almost unnecessary". https://github.com/ggerganov/llama.cpp/pull/651#pullrequestreview-1368052138 https://github.com/ggerganov/llama.cpp/pull/651#pullrequestr... So I'm not sure why a sandbox would bundle llama.cpp and claim to be secure. They would need more evidence than this to make such a claim.
- halyconWays 3y agoThis user was caught stealing code and banned from llama.cpp by its creator https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35411909 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35411909